A couple of quick tips: First, if you’re unsure about how your checks feed through your printer, you can click the Print First Check button to tell Quicken to print only a single check.This detour symbol indicates instructions in a Task specifically for Bill Pay within Quicken (Bill. 9Click OK and let the games begin. Quicken, happy with your progress, redisplays the Select Checks to Print: Checking dialog box.I got this link in case you have other questions about QuickBooks: Help Articles. Also, I'll be sending this to our Product Team to let them know how this is useful to your business. As a workaround, you can check for a third-party app that can print the check in the middle block. I will try first put in some history, and then try to address each common problem.Currently, you're unable to edit the check template in QuickBooks. This FAQ addresses the reasons, the current status, and possible workarounds.
![]() See this link for information about this problem, and see that Quicken is not the only program that this has been a problem for: The latest attempt by Intuit to fix this problem came out in Quicken 2012, and is also in Quicken 2013, and it is called “Use Large Fonts." The idea here is for Quicken to do the scaling, as in make everything 125% larger. There have been several attempts that never made it out of Beta to get Quicken to work right with a DPI scaling of something other than 100%/smaller/normal (different operating systems have different names for this). There is a lot of work to make this look right, and when you add in the fact that Quicken is a mix of GUI styles it has been next to impossible for Intuit make this work/look right in Quicken. The truth is that over the different versions of Windows Microsoft has actually done different things for this, and they have never in the core provided the programmer a simple solution. They may look similar, but at the core they are very different as can be seen in the way you can (or can’t) change fonts and columns and such.People using the Windows DPI scaling to make everything larger tend to say something to the effect that why does such a simple thing like making everything larger mess up things in Quicken. These two have had a long history of being developed pretty much as separate things. What version of quicktime works with sierra version 10126 for a macNo solution is going to be perfect for 100% of the setups out there.I'm trying to make sense of this. Well it turns out that this “internal” scaling had even greater effects on how bad the Windows DPI scaling would “disturb” Quicken’s “look”.Also it should be noted that there is a secondary problem of people wanting more and more on their screens and having higher resolution screens to support it, and then the people for one reason or another want to run at a lower resolution, and how does the GUI designer construct the GUI in a way that it works for these different groups. So by definition for the last complaint they wanted Quicken to do the 125% scaling even when other programs weren’t. The problems described above, and for the complaint “All my other applications are fine, but the print on Quicken is too small”. Can I Write Checks From Quicken 2015 Code From OlderOther app vendors do this. For a great example of what happens when apps don't implement their own internal ways to deal with it, see what happens when you try to run Photoshop CS6 for Windows on a computer with a high-res display!If Quicken still contains legacy code from older Windows versions, it makes sense that trying to change the font and/or the scale of the user interface would be a major nightmare.The right thing would be for Intuit to bite the bullet and modernize their code. Even today, Windows has big problems with HiDPI screens (such as Retina screens), and app writers generally have to implement a lot of their own code to handle hi-res screens. ![]() OO is arguably less efficient that procedural code in execution, but the cost of developing and modifying reliable software is enormously reduced. Along with the Unix kernel, OS X brought with it the relatively new Object-oriented design and development and even the Objective C which supports the Object Oriented environment known as Cocoa. It was at that point Steve Jobs returned to Apple and had the economic courage, and technological foresight to scrap OS 9 completely and start over with the Unix based OS X. So yes, your quote makes all sorts of sense to me and Quicken is far from the only developer guilty of the same things.Apple was struggling with the same decision and an OS (9) that simply could not be adapted into a modern multi-tasking, multi-threading, multi-user OS. Thus the Quicken you are attempting to use today. Leaving the situation described in your quote. Other app vendors do this. It does not have all the features of Quicken like home inventory, but it does have all the major accounting features.IThe right thing would be for Intuit to bite the bullet and modernize their code. Unfortunately the complexity of modern accounting and tax software pretty well rules out the one or two person software development shops in that arena.I have not looked at it on Windows, but Moneydance is a credible replacement for Quicken and available on Windows, OS X, and a variety of Unix platforms. I think the plethora of apps for iOS and OS X on the app store are a testament to the long term effect of Apple's decision and App Store sales have created a lot of millionaire developers. Following the advent of OS X several small Apple developers took the courageous step of dumping their old code base and moving into OO. That research institute eventually became the University of Texas at Dallas.In a lot of ways, object oriented programming has been with the Mac from the start. Because of pressure from Wall Street about spending too much money on advanced research that might not show a profit for 10 or 15 years the company founders and senior corporate officers got together with their counterparts from other electronic technology companies in the area and privately funded an independent research institute to do long term advanced research out from under Wall Street financial oversight. Wall Street constantly berates Apple for spending too much money on research, engineering, and product development because of that short term view.I worked as a software design engineer for over thirty years at one of those multi-billion dollar companies whose bread and butter was, and is, creating state of the art electronic products. But Software developers do not run multi-billion dollar corporations — the MBAs and Wall Street bankers do and their focus is invariably short term profit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorNick ArchivesCategories |